ABSTRACT
Therapy with neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) is particularly relevant during COVID-19 outbreaks in patients at high risk of severe disease, including kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Objective(s): to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neutralizing mAbs in KTRs with mild to moderate COVID-19. Materials and methods. The retrospective study included 99 KTRs who received inpatient treatment for COVID-19 between September 1 and December 31, 2021. Patients were 52.0 +/- 11.5 years old (M, 47.5%). Bamlanivimab/etesevimab combination drug at a dose of 700/1400 mg was used as mAbs. To evaluate the efficacy of mAbs therapy, two groups of patients were identified. Group 1 consisted of 33 KTRs who received mAbs as one of the therapy components, while group 2 consisted of 66 patients who received no mAbs. Discharge from the hospital or death was considered as the endpoint of follow-up. Results. In group 1, after the use of mAb, progression of pulmonary process was observed less frequently than in the control group with CT1-2 transformation to CT3-4 (9.1% vs. 30.3%, respectively, p < 0.01). Group 1 KTRs differed significantly from group 2 - lower need for ICU and ventilator care (6.1% vs. 27.3% and 3% vs. 19.8%, respectively). The groups were comparable by sex, age, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and time after kidney transplant (KTx) at the onset of the disease and by aseline blood biochemistry parameter values at the time of hospitalization. Only C-reactive protein (CRP) and fibrinogen values were higher in the non-mAbs patients who were hospitalized later in the course of the disease (7.7 +/- 3.2 days versus 4.6 +/- 1.6 days in group 1, p < 0.001). The frequency of prescription of other therapies did not differ between the compared groups. Use of mAbs significantly reduced mortality from 19.7% in KTRs in group 2 to 3% in group 1 without adverse effect on graft function. Conclusion. The use of mAbs therapy in the early stages of COVID-19 in KTRs is safe, it prevents severe COVID-19, and reduces the incidence of adverse outcomes.Copyright © 2023 Russian Transplant Society. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To describe the implementation of an ED-based program to offer monoclonal antibody therapy to patients with mild-moderate COVID-19 disease. Background(s): Monoclonal antibody therapy (MOAB) has recently emerged as a treatment for mild to moderate COVID-19, potentially preventing those with underlying conditions from progressing to severe illness and hospitalization. Further, as EDs are the primary point of health care access for many at-risk individuals, offering MOAB in the ED may increase availability of treatment options for patients from traditionally underserved communities. Method(s): A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients 12 years and above who received treatment in our urban, academic, community hospital. Patients 12 years and older were screened for eligibility during ED visits or during follow-up calls providing positive test results. Staff was trained on specific consent, infusion, monitoring, and documentation procedures adherent to MOAB administration under the Emergency Use Authorization. Patients were contacted following MOAB and queried regarding symptom resolution and healthcare utilization. Data regarding patient demographics, ED course, and 7-day unscheduled visits were collected. Result(s): In this ongoing quality improvement initiative, from December 2020 to March 2021, there were 26,229 patient encounters at the pilot ED site. 84 patients were provided MOAB, 87% Bamlanivimab and 13% Bamlanivimab/Etesevimab. Patients had a mean age of 52.3 years (SD 24.4);21% were 12-17 years of age and 37% were >65 years old. 52% were male. 33% self-reported as Caucasian, 19% Black, 18% Asian/Pacific Islander, 21% as other, and 9% were unknown. 17% identified as Latinx. 19% of patients were insured by Medicaid, 36% Medicare, 39% commercially insured, and 6% were uninsured. Patients had symptoms a median of 3 days prior to MOAB. After age (46%), the most commonly reported eligibility criteria was obesity (20%), followed by hypertension (11%) and immunocompromised state (11%). 74% of infusions were administered during nights and weekends. No infusion reactions occurred. 8% returned to an ED within 7 days of MOAB, 5% were hospitalized. No patients required ICU admission or died. Conclusion(s): ED-based MOAB has been safely implemented and may be an effective treatment for patients with mild to moderate COVID-19. Health-system wide expansion of this program may provide opportunities to offer this life-saving therapy to underserved populations with poor access to care.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Passive immunization with mAbs has been employed in COVID-19. We performed a systematic review of the literature assessing the endogenous humoral immune response against SARS-CoV-2 in patients treated with mAbs. Administration of mAbs in seronegative patients led to a reduction in both antibody titres and neutralizing activity against the virus.Copyright © 2022
ABSTRACT
Despite the measures taken and the molecular advances for the development of new agents for the control of SARS-CoV-2 infection, there is still insufficient development of an effective treatment. The objective of the review was to de-scribe the clinical studies and reported articles on drugs used as possible therapeutic agents for COVID-19 and the main conclusions on their reuse. A non-systematic review through PubMed, ScienceDirect, and clinical trials at ClinicalTrials. gov on original articles and case report in English and Span-ish that will report information on COVID-19 treatment and its main conclusions. Articles that were not relevant or that did not mention updated information to that reported in other articles were excluded. A total of 99 bibliographic references were included. COVID-19 appears as a multisystemic disease with variable clinical symptoms. Since no specific treatment is yet known, multiple drugs have been proposed that attack the different pathways of SARS-CoV-2. For severe disease in patients who require hospitalization and oxygen support, the use of remdesivir, dexamethasone, or tocilizumab is recommended if there are patient conditions that apply to use them. The use of ivermectin, colchicine, lopinavir/ritonavir, hydroxy-chloroquine, and chloroquine have not reported benefits that surpass adverse effects.
ABSTRACT
SESSION TITLE: Pathologies of the Post-COVID-19 World SESSION TYPE: Rapid Fire Case Reports PRESENTED ON: 10/18/2022 10:15 am - 11:10 am INTRODUCTION: Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, COVID-19 Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis (CAPA) has been on the rise. This superinfection, if not properly identified and treated, has shown to increase mortality up to 67% in COVID-19 patients. We are presenting a late presentation of CAPA after 4-month of COVID-19 infection and treated successfully. CASE PRESENTATION: A 57-year-old female patient with past medical history type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension and cardiomyopathy in addition to COVID-19 pneumonia treated for months ago with azithromycin, Bamlanivimab/Etesevimab, and Dexamethasone who presents to the hospital with massive hemoptysis and shortness of breath requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation. There was no reported history of recent travel, smoking, alcohol, or illicit drug use. Physical exam showed diminished lung sounds at the right lower lobe. Her labs showed mild leukocytosis, lactic acidosis and negative COVID-19 PCR. CT scan showed dense consolidation on right lower lobe consistent with lobar pneumonia and centrilobular ground glass opacities in the right upper lobe. Bronchoscopy showed complete obstruction of right bronchus intermedius and minimal blood clots in LLL. BAL respiratory culture, fungal smear, acid fast bacilli were non-diagnostic and negative for malignancy. Patient continued to have hemoptysis and bronchoscopy was repeated with negative cytology and cultures. The patient continued to have hemoptysis and she was transferred to tertiary center were bronchoscopy was repeated and confirmed right bronchus intermedius stenosis, blood clots, and suspicious right mainstem nodules with mucosal lesion. Biopsy results from bronchoscopy came back positive for the morphologic features of Aspergillus species. The patient was started on voriconazole with significant improvement in her symptoms. DISCUSSION: The recent literature of COVID-19 suggest association between COVID infection and invasive pulmonary Aspergillosis. COVID-19 virus causes damage in the airway epithelium and enable aspergillus to invade the pulmonary tract leading to serious infections with Aspergillus. It has also been known that Aspergillus infections are associated with diabetes mellitus and immune suppression which can be precipitated by steroid use and other treatments for COVID-19 infection like IL-6 inhibitors. Here in our patient with help of tissue biopsy we diagnosed CAPA, started treatment early and treated successfully. CONCLUSIONS: CAPA can be difficult to diagnose and needs high index of suspicion in the appropriate clinical scenario when dealing with post COVID respiratory complaints like hemoptysis. Bronchoalveolar lavage alone without tissue biopsy might miss the diagnosis in the context of invasive aspergillosis like the scenario we observed in our case. Doing tissue biopsy through bronchoscopy might add more clinical benefit when Aspergillus infections are suspected. Reference #1: Chih-Cheng Lai, Weng-Liang Yu, COVID-19 associated with pulmonary aspergillosis: A literature review, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2020.09.004 DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Haytham Adada No relevant relationships by Mahmoud Amarna No relevant relationships by Rishika Bajaj No relevant relationships by Camelia Chirculescu No relevant relationships by Sonia Dogra No relevant relationships by Azad Patel